1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Proposed EPA rules will allow testing of pesticides on children

Discussion in 'Alley of Dangerous Angles' started by Rallymama, Jan 17, 2006.

  1. Rallymama Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2002
    Messages:
    4,329
    Media:
    2
    Likes Received:
    11
    Remove all ads!
    Seriously!
    Summary article from San Francisco Chronicle.
    More detail, including quotations from the rule text, from an admittedly biased source.

    What were they thinking, beyond how to placate the industry while incurring minimal risk of future lawsuits? The really scary part is the idea that this is in accordance with federal rules!

    I have a scientific mind, so I understand the need for knowing the downstream effects and risks and such of these compounds. But to deliberately expose people without their knowledge and consent? That's appalling, and utterly reprehensible. When it comes to medicines - compounds which are intended to be of direct benefit to the person exposed - the rules for testing are much, much more stringent. So why should companies making harmful materials be allowed to get by with doing any less?
     
    Rallymama, Jan 17, 2006
    #1
  2. Blackthorne TA

    Blackthorne TA Master in his Own Mind Staff Member ★ SPS Account Holder Adored Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2000
    Messages:
    10,407
    Media:
    40
    Likes Received:
    231
    Gender:
    Male
    The sections that are objected to under the grounds of lack of consent, are sections under which the procedure provides a direct benefit to the subject, or if there is no greater than minimal risk to the subject. Also, there is a board that makes the determination if it is OK.

    The applicable texts:
    Section 26.408 were the sections providing the consent rules that were found objectionable.
     
    Blackthorne TA, Jan 17, 2006
    #2
  3. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    I also noticed that some of this stuff was talking about passive testing. If you want a small blood sample to see how much toxic materia a child is already consuming in low-income housing, I don't see a problem. I could even understand, though not agree with, doing that without parental concent.
     
    NOG (No Other Gods), Jan 17, 2006
    #3
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.