POLL: Is Hillary Clinton a babe?!?

Remove all ads!

Well, how about not liking being suspended 25 feet above a lava pit?

How's that for mis-quoting?

Edit: Oh yeah, on topic - not a babe!

 

Strap on a few steel cables. Sounds like fun.

On topic: This thread is ridiculous. Look at the pictures of her and if you start feeling some attraction, go check your affiliation.

 

Inteligent and powerful are great. They just have nothing to do with being a babe.
Personally, I prefer intelligent, powerful babes.

 

I am going to have to give Hillary the thumbs down. Sorry, but I have some preferences and she doesn't meet any.

 

I have seen once a documentary movie about the Clinton and naturally it had photos and videos from the first years of his marriage with Hillary and from college where their love flourished.
Now given this input with accordance to her present image now she looks better than then.
But still if she ever (thank God this will never happen) come to me with sexual kind proposals, i would most propably puke in front of her with the thought of her and me.
Man i really felt like puking right now.

 

Hardly a babe. But... I figured you might have meant someone else (like Helena Bonham Carter or something ) and so I voted 'yes' to be on the safe side. Can't really afford to turn any women down these days

I haven't seen her ankles though. The ankle isn't the most interesting part of the female anatomy, really. (in my humble opinion, of course).

 

Maybe it's an American thing.

In other words - Hell no!
Gimme Chelsea Clinton any day. BTW, anyone know why Chelsea has no brothers or sisters? It's because Monica Lewinsky swallowed them all!

 

Wow ... all I can say is wow.

Not to Hilary ... to the fact that anyone thinks her attractive. Talk about brainwashing ... liberals can't just get people to agree with the Clinton's politics ... they have to get people to think that Hilary is attractive, the smartest woman alive, ad nauseum.

I think Regan was a great president ... but was Nancy attractive to me? Nope.

Hilary would be the perfect fried chicken dinner ... two left wings, small breast and big thighs.

 

This really should have been a Chelsea vs. the Bush Daughters poll!

 

That would be a good contest Bel!

On one hand you have a pair of blonde twins commonly referred to as The Bush Twins

On the other hand, you have Chelsea, and though I don't think she's attractive, if morals run in the family, you know she's easy.

 

OK,

Have to pop in to lend some sanity to this thread.

Hillary is NOT a babe.

Hillary NEVER was a babe.

Hillary NEVER will be a babe.

It has nothing to do with her political affiliations or views. She could recant all of her liberal gibberish, denounce the rhetoric of the Democrats, join the Rush Limbaugh fan club, don a "Wolfowitz ROCKS" T-shirt, burn all copies of "It Takes a Village"...

And she would still be decidely in the NON-babe category.

That's fine...it is perfectly OK for her to not be a babe and still be an intelligent, powerful woman.

Since the inception of photographic record, there has been one documented "Babe" in the ranks of current or former First Ladies...Jacqueline Kennedy.

Unless of course you include Ex-First Ladies, then you would have to throw in Jane Wyman.

Now everyone can find something more meaningful to argue about.

 

Hmm... naah. Not really.

But to note on the supposed lack of looks of women in politics, we DO have a former Miss Finland in our goverment. *wink*

 

But Italy had a former pornstar in it's government, try to beat that.

 

Quick thought:... NO?

At her age i somehow doubt that i would ever call her a "babe".