1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Planting political questions

Discussion in 'Alley of Lingering Sighs' started by The Great Snook, Nov 12, 2007.

  1. Jack Funk Gems: 24/31
    Latest gem: Water Opal


    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2001
    Messages:
    1,778
    Likes Received:
    25
    I see your point. I was thinking more about the number of gays serving in the military, not in the general population. That said, I still don't think the question merited inclusion in the debate. Especially not the amount of time it was given. 5% of the population is not effected by the policy. Many of those 5% are past the age of joining and many would not join anyway (or vote Republican).

    These debates are for a limited amount of time. The time should be used to illuminate the policies that have an impact on a greater portion of the population, not a (at most) 3% - 5% slice.

    Many will disagree with this opinion. But the intellectually honest will acknowledge that the question was not included to bring about discussion of a topic that is highly relevant to this Presidential election (has it been asked in the Dem debates?). It was asked with the hopes of embarrassing the Republican candidates.
     
  2. The Shaman Gems: 28/31
    Latest gem: Star Sapphire


    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    54
    I'm inclined to disagree. I think Republican politicians and pundits tend to devote more attention to the gay issue, and thus it can be more controversial - and thus defining - for their candidates. I, personally, would like to know their differences on the controversial issues if I were to choose among candidates.

    As for it being embarassing, they are running for public office, so they shouldn't be embarassed to voice their positions. What is this, a Victorian teatime party?
     
  3. Jack Funk Gems: 24/31
    Latest gem: Water Opal


    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2001
    Messages:
    1,778
    Likes Received:
    25
    @The Shaman
    So you feel the question was highly relevant to the selection of a Republican candidate for President? I disagree.
     
  4. AMaster Gems: 26/31
    Latest gem: Diamond


    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    2,495
    Media:
    1
    Likes Received:
    50
    Well, a significant segment of the Republican base seems to think teh ghei is an important national issue, so it's not as though it was out of place.
     
  5. Jack Funk Gems: 24/31
    Latest gem: Water Opal


    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2001
    Messages:
    1,778
    Likes Received:
    25
    How so?
     
  6. AMaster Gems: 26/31
    Latest gem: Diamond


    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    2,495
    Media:
    1
    Likes Received:
    50
    Religious Right - votes Republican (in large numbers), obsesses over the gay. Therefore anything dealing with the gay is relevant to a significant proportion of the Republican Party. Therefore anything dealing with the gay isn't out of place in a Republican debate.

    Or, to put this another way; 'don't ask, don't tell' may not matter to you, but it matters to your fellow travelers.
     
  7. Jack Funk Gems: 24/31
    Latest gem: Water Opal


    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2001
    Messages:
    1,778
    Likes Received:
    25
    I see your point.
     
  8. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,607
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Because gay rights is a huge issue for religious conservatives.

    EDIT: Woops! I didn't see page 2. What AMaster said.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.