1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

KOTOR: HK-47's D&D alignment

Discussion in 'Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic Series' started by SlickRCBD, Sep 3, 2010.

?

What AD&D alignemnt would HK-47 be?

  1. Lawful Good

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Neutral Good

    5.9%
  3. Chaotic Good

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Lawful Neutral

    5.9%
  5. True Neutral/Neutral-Neutral

    5.9%
  6. Chaotic Neutral

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Lawful Evil

    41.2%
  8. Neutral Evil

    17.6%
  9. Chaotic Evil

    23.5%
  1. SlickRCBD Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Resourceful Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,127
    Media:
    47
    Likes Received:
    188
    Gender:
    Male
    I've just had an argument with a friend about HK-47.
    Given that KOTOR seems to be partly based in the same D20 system of Wizards of the Coast that D&D 3.X is based in, it wouldn't be that difficult to bring someone (or is it something) like HK-47 into a D&D world.

    The question is, as a droid, would HK-47's alignment be true neutral since like an animal he doesn't have the mental ability to have a moral compass, or since he's a droid bound to obey the commands given to him pretty much to the letter and all that, would he be lawful?

    Given how amoral and bloodthirsty he is, would he be evil or again, as a more or less unfeeling droid would he be neutral?

    I myself am leaning towards lawful neutral since I recall mechanis and the way the Lawful Neutral beings there could hunt down anyone.
     
  2. Rawgrim Gems: 21/31
    Latest gem: Pearl


    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    27
    Lawful evil, I would think. His programming would dictate that its "law" for him. Evil due to the actions that he does\has done. However, I do seem to recall reading, in the SW rpg books, that droids do not have alignments, since they are machines.
     
  3. Caradhras

    Caradhras I may be bad... but I feel gooood! Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,111
    Media:
    99
    Likes Received:
    104
    Gender:
    Male
    The follow orders things points at lawful, the actions and comments point toward evil. This droid is a machine and a weapon so we could argue that morality wouldn't apply but as a droid it has some sort of AI and it isn't programmed to value life or respect the Three Laws of Robotics (different setting I know).

    So I'd say it depends whether or not you consider that the droid is sentient and whether or not it has an AI. If it does then evil would make sense since it would have to be evil to consciously harm someone.

    It would have to be lawful unless capable of not following orders or its programs.

    The whole badass attitude ("meatbags") and blatant disrespect for life hints at LE in my opinion.
     
  4. Morgoth

    Morgoth La lune ne garde aucune rancune Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2002
    Messages:
    3,652
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    86
    Gender:
    Male
    I voted true neutral since he clearly is a robot with an AI that is only suited for rudimentary problem solving. It seems to me that the robots in KOTOR are quite simplistic, which is odd considering how technologically advanced the world is. HK-47 seems to lack morality, even though our current morality is based on reason and robots *are* quite capable of reasoning. I guess that it was programmed to be bloodthirsty.

    Edit:
    Jeez. How much nerd cred do I get for discussing the morality of fictive robots?
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2010
  5. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Here's the rub, though. HK-47 doesn't always follow orders. He only automatically and unquestioningly follows Revan's orders. I'd say it's a toss-up between lawful and neutral evil.
     
  6. Yulaw9460 Gems: 9/31
    Latest gem: Iol


    Distinguished Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Messages:
    319
    Media:
    20
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Revan was the Sith Lord Supreme in the Sith Army, so to speak. His word WAS the law. And seeing that HK-47 always obeyed Revan, he did in fact obey the law to the letter. And from his various bits of dialogue, it's pretty safe to assume that he enjoyed the killings he either orchestrated by himself or was commanded to (ergo evil to the memory core).

    Because he did kill without compunction on numerous occations if he thought it would benefit his later masters, and even though he'd forgotten all about Revan, I guess you could say he still operated by the same (lack of) moral compass Revan programmed him with. I'd go for Lawful Evil. He's also blatantly loyal to Revan, even if Revan turns out to be a Boyscout Incarnate.
     
  7. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Yulaw, HK-47 betrayed most of his matters at one point or another. That he never betrayed Revan is hardly compelling evidence that he is purely lawful.
     
  8. Yulaw9460 Gems: 9/31
    Latest gem: Iol


    Distinguished Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Messages:
    319
    Media:
    20
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    He didn't betray his masters. They were killed because of him, but that's not the same. One stabbed him at got electrocuted after learning that HK killed 104 freebies for him. Another got killed while he was away on a mission. A target caught him, reprogrammed him and sent him back to kill his master, but he wasn't fond of doing that. And so on.
     
  9. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    And killing 104 freebies was lawful? He was under no orders to do so, and had nothing to gain by doing it. That falls pretty far on the chaotic end of the alignment pool, which isn't really a good thing if you're arguing for a lawful alignment. Now that you've reminded me of that little tidbit, I am in fact now rather firmly entrenched in the not-lawful interpretation of his alignment. I'd still accept the argument that he was just acting in accordance with his programing but it's really just semantics at that point, isn't it? Sure, he was acting in accordance to his programming, but he was programmed to behave in a manner not in keeping with lawful alignment. What we have here is a classic chicken/egg dilemma.

    Is he lawful because he acted in accordance with his programming? If we accept that, we must also accept that he isn't evil, since that aspect of his behavior is also in keeping with his programming. I'm OK with that, but it makes more sense to me to judge his alignment by his actions.
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2010
  10. Yulaw9460 Gems: 9/31
    Latest gem: Iol


    Distinguished Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Messages:
    319
    Media:
    20
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, in that case, Revan and Malak weren't evil either. They were simply being driven by the Dark Side, even though they must have enjoyed it, same as HK being programmed and delighting in the mayhem because of it. We get more than one hint that the Force control Jedi and Sith just as much as they seem to control it. Seems to me that the align-o-meter is broken somehow. :p
     
  11. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Yulaw, turning to the dark side is something you do by choice in the star wars universe. An AI, regardless of its sophistication, does not choose how it is programmed. That aside, you ignore the main thrust of my point -- that it matters not whether HK-47 was programmed to behave unlawfully or whether he chose to do so. We all have "reasons" for our alignment, but those reasons don't change what the alignment is.

    Hedonism Bot was programmed to be hedonistic -- whether or not he was programmed to be hedonistic has no effect on whether or not it is appropriate to state that Hedonism Bot is hedonistic. Alignment should work the same way, or the concept should be thrown out in its entirety, since we all have "reasons" that would explain it.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2010
  12. Yulaw9460 Gems: 9/31
    Latest gem: Iol


    Distinguished Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Messages:
    319
    Media:
    20
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Then again, pretending it's just a game is just plain unrealisticly boring, right? :p
     
  13. Cap'n CJ

    Cap'n CJ Arrr! Veteran

    Joined:
    May 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,389
    Media:
    4
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gender:
    Male
    I voted Neutral Evil but I think i've changed my mind.

    He's a machine, incapable of empathyof any kind. He has no emotions, no ambitions, etc. He is True Neutral.

    Edit: To clarify - Being Good, Evil, Chaotic, or Lawful are choices made by an individual. He, essentially, does not have choice, he's a machine.
     
  14. Luj1 Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise


    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    lawful evil
     
  15. Shoshino

    Shoshino Irritant Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    2,086
    Media:
    66
    Likes Received:
    79
    Gender:
    Male
    Can he have an alignment?
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.