1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Hackers & Global Warming

Discussion in 'Alley of Lingering Sighs' started by pplr, Nov 30, 2009.

  1. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh, yes, really a reliable source there. Isn't he the liberal version of Bill O'Rilley or something?

    Yes, let's listen to the people who know what they're talking about. See, there's the problem. Real scientists disagree with AGW. This isn't some "let's ignore the evidence" BS. This is a "Your 'evidence' is a bunch of unsubstantiated assertions, not evidence." Remember, most of those climate models ignore major known warming and cooling trends in history.

    That one's pretty nice, and covers most of the facts well, but I think their conclusion ignores their own presented facts and draws an overly-rosy picture. While I'll agree that the "Nature trick" comment is likely innocent (and honestly I didn't think much of it when I first saw it), there's a lot more damning stuff that's come out than that.

    Eh, yes and no. And, honestly, more no than yes. You see, the climate models rely heavily on what's called "interpolation". That's when you have, for example, temperature data for the entire world, except for these few regions of open ocean and some of the Sahara. Well, you don't know what those temperatures are, but you do know what temperatures other regions similar to them, and especially surrounding them, are at, so you do some mathematical "guestimation". You fill in the blanks with systems of averages, taken from statistically determined data points to provide the most continuous and likely temperature data for the blank regions. The problem is, those aren't the actual temperatures for those regions, which means you have just injected a certain amount of error into your model. Now, every model has error of some kind or another, so no surprise there, but the more data you have to interpolate, the more error you have. Add to that the facts that many of the temperature collection methods are up for debate, that the rules that govern the system are still theoretical, and not tested or proven, and that, even in a well-studied field like fluid mechanics, where the laws have been tested, simulations like this require substantial testing against confirmed data before they're accepted (because errors are so very, very easy to make in complex systems like this), and the major product of climatology looks less like equations with remaining degrees of freedom and more like educated guess-work.
     
  2. Blackthorne TA

    Blackthorne TA Master in his Own Mind Staff Member ★ SPS Account Holder Adored Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2000
    Messages:
    10,407
    Media:
    40
    Likes Received:
    231
    Gender:
    Male
    The "nature trick" is certainly not innocent. Does it mean much? I don't know. The trick was to "hide the decline" in the modern temperature trend of the various temperature reconstructions.

    In more verbose terms, the temperature reconstructions (i.e. those temperature data that are derived from proxies rather than direct measurement; the ones that show temperature data way back into the past) diverged from the modern (from around 1960 or so on) measured temperature data and began to decline instead of the drastic increase the measured temperatures showed, and they did not want that to show up in their temperature graphs.

    So why is this important? Because it calls in to question whether the temperature reconstructions are accurate. If they don't match with modern measured data, how do you know they accurately reflect the temperature back where there were no measurements? And if they don't reflect the past temperatures, how do you know the present warming is "unprecedented" rather than something that has happened before?
     
  3. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    And, speaking from the perspective of someone who's worked with similarly interpolative programs, I can say that can be accurate terminology for a legitimate technique. Of course, we had the advantage that we knew what the system was supposed to be doing, so if the model was improperly emphasizing a minor trait of the system and making it a major feature, we knew to correct it. Unfortunately, climatologists don't have such a guideline, which is why I said it was only "likely" innocent, and not surely so.
     
  4. Blackthorne TA

    Blackthorne TA Master in his Own Mind Staff Member ★ SPS Account Holder Adored Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2000
    Messages:
    10,407
    Media:
    40
    Likes Received:
    231
    Gender:
    Male
    The "technique" was to throw away the data that did not match with the story they wanted to tell and splice the reconstructed data with the modern data at the point they started to diverge so that no divergence would show in the graph. That would be too inconvenient and be a distraction to the message.
     
  5. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Not really. He's more of a moderate Democrat. I suppose that for some conservatives, that would make him a liberal (there are "some" conservatives who are ignorant enough to believe that all Dems are liberals), but to a liberal like myself, no he doesn't seem to be all that much of one. I just liked his take on it.

    It doesn't matter what they think; it matters what the special interest and lobbyists think. They pretty much write the final laws here. C&T will never make it out of the Senate without huge give-aways to big business. There will be large loop-holes, which you will be able to drive the Artic Circle through once they finish it. But given the current size of the Artic Circle -- and what it will be in the future -- that's not saying much. And I'm sure there will be some niffty "trick" that will make it "seem to disappear."
     
  6. Aikanaro Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    5,521
    Likes Received:
    20
    I've been following Australia's political situation rather closely recently (I even made a thread about it!), so yes, I know what the opposition is doing. You should have a look at their approval rating - it's rather funny.

    Our opposition is a joke, and the Greens gain in strength and senate seats at every election. The main reason we don't have a carbon trading scheme is because the government didn't want to negotiate with the Greens because they knew that they'd play hardball and actually call for significant cuts, while Turnbull was happy to negotiate and come up with something that would work for business. His party used it as an excuse to shoot him down. This whole situation had very little to do with climate change (although there are certainly a lot in the Liberal party who think it isn't happening), and more to do with Turnbull's leadership failure. It certainly doesn't reflect the view of the Australian public. The opposition is going to be crucified for this decision if the government/Greens play their cards right.

    You're also still talking as though something big and terrible has actually been revealed by the hack. It hasn't. While, yes, I agree that they should have kept their data, this doesn't change anything overall. It's only the shrill right wing that are claiming that the entire of climate change science has just collapsed in a mess of lies. Those with credibility are saying that nothing has changed (or if you disagree, link to someone credible).

    I have no trouble with verifying what they're talking about, mind you. Go ahead, if you have the skills and knowledge to do so, that's great. The problem comes when a lot of the 'verifying' is being done by people who want them to be wrong, or just don't know how to tell if they're wrong or not. That seems to be the sort of people who are making the biggest deal out of the hack.

    pplr:
    Well, yeah, I was certainly being over the top (and maybe misused 'priest'), but still, from all I can tell, the American public seems incredibly hostile to science - or ignorant, at least.
    Hmm, well, this is off-topic, but I just googled and found this gallup poll. The result is a little depressing.

    I'm not saying that all Americans are scientifically illiterate ... but I don't think I'm misspeaking by saying that a large portion of the population is, especially compared to other Western counties.

    I'm pretty sure elections are funded privately and with taxpayer's money. The donations are nowhere near as big a deal as in the US though, and I think there are strong limits. Except as a scandal, you don't really hear anything about campaign funding.

    Oh wait, there's a wiki article, so I can stop talking out of my arse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_donations_in_Australia

    But all the same, it getting voted down in the senate is far more to do with the Liberal party's moderate/right wing schism and dissatisfaction with Turnbull's leadership than anything else. Many businesses that would have been affected were supporting the amended bill.

    NOG:
    Yes, there are climate scientists who disagree that climate change is human-caused. The poll I linked clearly showed that. It also clearly showed that they were in the minority by a vast number. I'm not saying we should dismiss them, but I'm saying that if we need to pick a side here (and we do), going with the overwhelming majority and acting on the evidence they've provided is the most sensible route.

    (That you linked to a Fox News article written by some guy who wrote a book called 'Freedomnomics' didn't really help your point, I think)

    Edit: My rage is mostly reserved for those who dismiss it all as lies and a conspiracy, which is stupid. Wilful ignorance is horrible too, but the 'lies-and-conspiracy' crowd are poisoning the debate for ideological reasons. Those having rational arguments and discussion are fine in my book, and most of this thread has been that. Snook's post struck me strongly as a lies-and-conspiracy one.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2009
    Death Rabbit likes this.
  7. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Aik, I encourage you to revisit the old thread I linked to. There's a lot more on the letters there, but most of the links are dead now.

    As for the scientists, it's not so much the other climatologists I pay attention to, as the other scientists who cry foul when the climatology community attempts to re-write climate history to support their views. The claims of "unprecidented warming" are 100% bogus, and the estimates of mass-extinctions are hard to support given that all currently existing species except a few breeds of mosquitoes survived the last major warming period a few hundred years ago. Now, for those already in danger, warming may present an additional stressor that could tip them over the edge, but the idea that it will completely re-write the face of the world is preposterous.
     
  8. Aikanaro Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    5,521
    Likes Received:
    20
    I don't really feel like arguing, but this article popped up and I figured it was relevant: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/14/2771612.htm

    I don't think it's preposterous that warming could rewrite the face of the world. If places go under water because the ice caps have melted (and they have and are) - I think that counts.
     
  9. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    One thing confuses me on that report:
    Emperor Penguines don't need ice. They have dry land. Now, I could believe warming oceand may impact their food supply. Maybe. But not mating habits.

    As for sea level rise, the numbers are much more down-to-earth than most people fear. I think 1 foot over the next century is what's being talked about? Now, sure, that's not insignificant, but it's not going to sink all of India, either. The way some of the AGW crowd talks about it, you'd expect to see a WaterWorld type scenario by the end of the century.
     
  10. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    249
    Gender:
    Male
    Hmmm... You'd think that would be an easy question to answer, but it's not. I received a fellowship from the university, and part of the agreement of the fellowship would be that I would do research. The fellowship paid for my education. Additionally, the fellowship also stipulated that I work for the university as a lab assistant, in which I taught undergrad science students in general chemistry and organic chemistry. Now that I was paid work in addition to the free education (not a lot - about $1,000 per month), so you tell me - was I paid to do the research or not?

    I think there's a mis-placed decimal point there - either in the degree increase or the percentage listed. If 0.18 degrees accounts for just 0.3% of the total warming we've experienced, then the total warming is 60 degrees F. Or am I misinterpreting what that statistic is supposed to mean?

    I don't think so - I'd consider someone like Keith Olbermann, Aianna Huffington or Rachel Maddow to be the liberal equivalent of Bill O'Reilly. Matthew is pretty tame by comparison.
     
  11. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Mmm, that is sticky, but I'd classify it as "not exactly". Which of course means any ownership concerns come down to what exactly your agreement with the University was.

    The total current greenhouse effect is about 60 degrees F, yes. Of course, that should serve as a reminder that the greenhouse effect is actually necessary to some degree. There can be too much of it (theoretically), but there can also be too little. Too little greenhouse effect almost certainly contributed to the Ice Ages (along with other factors).
     
  12. The Great Snook Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,123
    Media:
    28
    Likes Received:
    313
    Gender:
    Male
    Woo Hoo, I can now officially call a Godwin. :D

    I love these videos.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 19, 2015
  13. Taluntain

    Taluntain Resident Alpha and Omega Staff Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Adored Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) BoM XenForo Migration Contributor [2015] (for helping support the migration to new forum software!)

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2000
    Messages:
    23,475
    Media:
    494
    Likes Received:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
    Yea, I know that it's hard to keep this thread on track what with a new straw being presented for the skeptics to grasp at, but do let's try, huh? :shake:
     
  14. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    249
    Gender:
    Male
    Here's something from Gregg Easterbrook on climate change. While the majority of this writer's time is devoted to economics, he does weigh in on environmental issues as well. In fact, he's written more than a few books. While he believes that global warming is real, he also believes that many of the doomsayers are exaggerating the affects it will have in the short term.

    Heads of State Pause Their Limos at Their Personal Jets to Denounce Fossil Fuel Use:

    As the Copenhagen climate summit grinds on with -- big surprise! -- nothing specific agreed upon, here's my summary of what you need to know about the global warming issue, bearing in mind yours truly is the author of an 800-page book about environmental policy (that book was so fast-paced, it only seemed like 700 pages):

    • There is indeed a strong scientific consensus regarding climate change. The deniers simply aren't honest about this.

    • The consensus is that in the last century, air has warmed by about one degree Fahrenheit while the oceans have warmed a little and become slightly acidic; rainfall patterns have changed in some places, and most though not all ice melting has accelerated.

    • That consensus is significant, but hardly means there is a crisis. Glaciers and sea ice, for example, have been in a melting cycle for thousands of years, while air warming has so far been good for farm yields. The doomsayers simply aren't honest about how mild the science consensus is.

    • Predictions of global devastation -- climate change is a "profound emergency" that will "ravage our planet" -- are absurd exaggerations, usually motivated by political or fund-raising agendas.

    • Climate change has serious possible negative consequences, especially if rainfall shifts away from agricultural regions.

    • Global poverty, disease, dirty air and lack of clean water in developing world cities and lack of education are far higher priorities than greenhouse gas emissions.

    • Smog and acid rain turned out to be far cheaper to control than predicted; the same may happen with greenhouse gases.

    • The United States must regulate greenhouse gases in order to bring American brainpower, in engineering and in business, to bear on the problem.

    • A carbon tax, not some super-complex cap-and-trade scheme that mainly creates jobs for bureaucrats and lawyers, would be the best approach.

    • If the United States invents technology to control greenhouse gases, no super-complex international treaty will be needed. Nations will adopt greenhouse controls on their own, because it will be in their self-interest to do so. Smog and acid rain are declining almost everywhere, though are not governed by any international treaty; nations have decided to regulate smog and acid rain emissions on their own, because it is in their self-interest to do so.

    As for the e-mails hacked from a greenhouse research center in the United Kingdom, e-mails are private correspondence. Copying them without permission is at the least unethical, and perhaps a crime. If you saw private letters on someone's desk, photocopied them and posted them on the Web, you would be considered a person of low character. Whoever hacked the climate e-mails is at the very least an unethical person of low character, and one should be wary of the agendas of unethical people.

    That said, many climate scientists are rigidly ideological and believe dissent must be shouted down. This is partly because of money and privilege. The United States and European Union spend about $6 billion annually on climate change research, and every penny goes to alarmism, because it can be used to justify government expansion. Being a climate doomsayer is a path to cash and tenure -- even to celebrity, as making wildly exaggerated claims got Al Gore a Noble Prize plus stock in companies now winning government subsidies triggered by alarmism. The doomsayers are lauded by foundations, go to parties with Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie and attend taxpayer-subsidized conferences in Nice. They've formed a guild with intense focus on maintaining guild structure. The 1962 Thomas Kuhn book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" is best-known for introducing the "paradigm shift" concept. Kuhn's larger argument was that science is not an abstract truth-seeking realm, rather, subject to fads and what is now called political correctness, and one in which many scientists are concerned foremost with safeguarding their sinecure by toeing the line.

    Plus the alarmists need to divert attention from the inconvenient truth that 20 years ago, Gore and James Hansen of NASA began to say that without immediate drastic action against greenhouse gases, there would soon be global calamities. Nothing was done -- and no problem so far. That is no reason to be complacent -- warming-caused problems may be in store. But for the self-interested alarmists, this is a reason to shout down their critics.

    Footnote: John Siemieniec of West Dundee, Ill., was among many readers to note the 140 private jets and 1,200 limos at the climate summit. World leaders and celebrities rode in comfort to a conference to wag their fingers about how somebody else should stop wasting fossil fuel.
     
  15. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    That actually sounds like a very nice summary of the situation as I see it. And better put than I could do.
     
  16. Taluntain

    Taluntain Resident Alpha and Omega Staff Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Adored Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) BoM XenForo Migration Contributor [2015] (for helping support the migration to new forum software!)

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2000
    Messages:
    23,475
    Media:
    494
    Likes Received:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
    Uh... and that only goes for climate scientists as opposed to hacks that Big Oil and other industries with a vested interest to retain status quo put on their payroll, not to mention all the hacks funded by right-wingers predominantly in the US? Money is obviously there and while there's no universal privilege for them, they're certainly the rock stars and the only bringers of truth for a large part (the majority?) of the Republicans.

    Oi, what a pot and kettle party...
     
  17. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    249
    Gender:
    Male
    That's the thing though - Gregg Easterbrook is a writer - not a politician. I've read a lot of his columns and books over the years, and as a whole, his views are not particularly conservative. Heck, it's not like he's denying that global warming is real, he even goes so far as to say that part of the rise is due to human activity (try finding a Republican who will say that). However, he is skeptical regarding to potential short-term consequences of the rise.

    In fact, in reading his points as a whole, it seems to me that he's arguing a middle ground, in stating that neither the GW deniers, nor the GW alarmists, are being totally honest in their positions.
     
  18. T2Bruno

    T2Bruno The only source of knowledge is experience Distinguished Member ★ SPS Account Holder Adored Veteran New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,765
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    440
    Gender:
    Male
    Tal I partially agree with you, but bad science is bad science. Manipulating data, losing data, not being forthright with basic observables is simply bad science. The case for climate change can stand on it's own even with the poor data points -- it's just not as alarming. Unfortunately, some individuals decided that causing alarm was more important than integrity. Lack of integrity in scientific work is simply unacceptable and causes the entire spectrum of study to be questioned.
     
  19. The Great Snook Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,123
    Media:
    28
    Likes Received:
    313
    Gender:
    Male
    Does this mean we should dismiss every valid point he brings up?
     
  20. Taluntain

    Taluntain Resident Alpha and Omega Staff Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Adored Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) BoM XenForo Migration Contributor [2015] (for helping support the migration to new forum software!)

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2000
    Messages:
    23,475
    Media:
    494
    Likes Received:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
    That's certainly true and I don't disagree. I only disagree with the few scientists in question here being used by the deniers as PROOF!!! that global warming is a hoax. I've been reading that all over the 'net since this thing came up, as if the holy grail for the deniers has been found. Get real... That said, everything about the climate change research should be transparent. If there are inconsistencies, don't gloss over them, even if it makes for a bit less pretty graph.

    No, I only found it odd that he forgot to mention that fact in an otherwise balanced opinion piece that I agree with for the most part.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.