Revised hell trials d/l question

Remove all ads!

I was trying to d/l the Revised Hell Trials mod to check the readme. It took me to an outside link in German (I think) and I was supposed to log in with email and a password.

Last time I d/l this mod, I was able to do so with no problems or having to log in on another site. Is this new and if so, how do get in to d/l the mod?

 

Isn't the Revised Hell Trials part of the Quest Pack mod? Or is it a different mod ?

 

Revised Hell Trials is no longer available for public consumption by itself. It has been made a part of the PPG Quest Pack.

 

All righty...and what else is part of this Quest mod that I probably don't want?

 

Oh it's a nice mod, you would probably use the whole bunch , nay I would take the quest stuff if I were you, but here's a link to PPGs Quest Packs readme

 

OMFG, it's this, isn't it? Bad, very bad. I don't want 'improved AI' and 'smarter/intelligent opponents'. I like stupid enemes! I don't play BG and BG2 for junk like this. I want to have some *fun*, not frustration. And I liked the Hell Trials mod! Maybe I have a backup cd from my OS rehaul weeks ago. Gods, I hope so.

 

You just have to install hell trials, no more no less.

 

Or, if you're really desparate to make sure none of the "extraneous" stuff gets in, I could just e-mail it to you. I've still got it from back when it was still available.

 

Don't install those components then.

Quest Pack is not, in fact, a mod designed to make everything ludicrously difficult. It is, as the name indicates, a pack...of quests!

By all means, feel free to delete the AI folder from the QP package if it will help provide confidence that I'm not trying to sneak it onto your install somehow *because I'm just that dastardly*.
Alternatively, just stop fretting and use the damn mod.

[ May 26, 2006, 10:52: Message edited by: SimDing0 ]

 

No. I don't care if it's possible to install each component separately.

Uh huh. I've heard this line before with other mods. I'm not talking about Tactics or Improved Sendai here. If, as you say, it is a mod of quests, why the need the change the enemies AI and placement (in certain dungeons)?

My ability for playing BG (and its sister games) is related to the difficulty provided by the game itself (Normal, Core, Insane). When I want a harder game, I use different PCs/NPCs or change the difficulty setting.

 

Irrational.

The FAQ discusses this.

And this.

 

What was the point of your last post, Sim? If you don't care to explain/talk about your mod, then just say so. Because I feel it unnecessary to d/l Quest pack for one select section does not mean I am irrational.

And how would you know how difficult/easy I like my game? I did not see this mentioned in the faq.

I'm so sorry that I am too staid in my gaming ways to want to have my hard-rolled PCs consistantly die (thusly a consistant reloading of games) due to others AI alterations (be they 'minor' or 'major'). It is not even one modder's mod that annoys me. I have tried several mods in similar veins (Greyclan from BWL, UB from PPG, Solafein from Weimer to name a few) and find I don't like people mucking with the AI. Period.

/rant

 

What you talkin' 'bout, Spock? People can be irrational; get over it.

@kuemper:
My offer still stands.

 

No, you are irrational because:
1) You want a component of Quest Pack without downloading Quest Pack.
2) You seem to think packaging said component alongside AI changes somehow affects it. Perhaps you should avoid downloading any mod which shares a site with any AI changes. After all, YOU NEVER KNOW!

 

While we're on the subject, I'd like to point out that Sim's improved AI is really balanced. He doesn't give enemies abilities they should have had and, in some ways, enemies even get nerfed. Beholders, for example, now can lose eystalks when you attack them. The AI "improvements" merely make enemies seem more credible......not more powerful (unless you up the difficulty setting).

SimDing0 is also very thorough with his readmes. If the readme says that component x does x.....that means that component x does x. It does not do y, because if it actually did y in addition to x, Sim would have documented it. You won't get tougher AI if you don't install it.

 

Wrong. She wants the RHT mod. The fact that it is no longer available on its own, when it used to be, does not make that irrational; it did exist separately, and there are undoubtedly many who have a copy of it like that. I want more 2e cRPGs; that's not likely to happen. She wants the RHT mod by itself; that is likely to happen, if she takes me up on my offer, or finds it on a backup CD.

That's not irrational either. Untrusting, perhaps, but I really can't blame her for that, given her past experience. It's quite rational to expect the same treatment from other mods that you've been consistently given by ones you have tried. Your...reputation as voiced by Drew notwithstanding, I can't blame her for not trusting that your mod won't screw with the original content of the RHT mod. (Don't get me wrong, though. I doubt that it would.)

The only irrationality here is adopting a defensive attitude instead of just politely correcting misconceptions. And then expecting her to trust your assertions despite calling her irrational and telling her to "just...use the damn mod".

 

Sim tends to get annoyed when people don't believe him on a subject about which he'd have absolutely no reason to lie. In truth, the QP version of the Hell trial mod is a better one to use. It has been bugfixed and the code has been improved so there will likely be less compatibility issues with other mods. Any trepidation regarding QP, or any mod from PPG or G3 for that matter, doing something other than what is documented is thoroughly misplaced.

 

The latest version of which is in Quest Pack. She wants an older version for an obscure reason. I'm simply trying to allay the mistrust she seems to harbour of my documentation for whatever reason. (It frustrates me, in fact, that I have to bear the consequences of other modders' inaccuracy--this is why, for example, Game-be-Gone irritates me.)

In any case, I believe Drew is doing a more polite job of representing me than I ever could. (Thank you.)

I should note, however, since you touch on it, that aside from bugfixes, I do make some changes to RHT based on discussions with the original author (specifically, the neutral path to the selfish test is no longer simply the good path without consequences: it is now more sensibly balanced from a roleplaying perspective--although you might well believe that means I'm only pretending its balanced and really I've ****ed up the mod completely). If these are what bother Kuemper then I believe that's a more legitimate concern, and I apologise for misinterpreting. However, being worried that I've included a ton of arbitrary crap as some sort of trojan really is downright offensive.

Incidentally, Kuemper, you mention UB as having influenced your opinion somehow. I'm curious. While it includes a restoration of the end battle (by myself, ironically), I'm not aware that it silently packages anything without properly documenting it.

And I really have been typing for a long time.

 

Why is that all modders out there have this "prima donna" thing about them?

She had a mod, she wants that mod. Nothing more, nothing else.

Some people don't like having to go through a custom install in order to install a simple section. I myself hate having to do that, especially when mods can be provided separatedly, as well as part of a package.

Also, did you know that some people don't have broadband? That means that downloading bigger files, especially for no reason other than a modder's whim, is a pain in the arse.

Moreover, some people simply don't feel confident enough to install things unless they are 120% sure that they won't mess with the way their games work, or the way they are used to play. I think this is reasonable too, wouldn't you say?

The fact that she had a bad experience with some mods is reason enough to mistrust any other mod unless proven otherwise. What's wrong with that? Do you download and install anything that you see advertised on the internet, without question it first, unless you knew the provider well enough? Why should I trust that your mod will be properly documented and that it won't screw my game the way other mods out there may have in the past, especially when you refuse to provide a simple explanation, and instead you get all defensive when confronted?


And for crying out loud, kuemper had only mentioned that the mods she installed so far had modified the enemies' AI, not that they had installed "secret components" in her PC. Relax mate, go for a run, have a smoke, or drink a cup of tea. Then read her post again, and try to understand what she said this time, not what you wanted to understand.

 

You should not trust me. I have a huge list of ulterior motives here. The truth is that I am actually Noel Edmunds, and I am attempting to trick everybody into downloading my mods so I can make fun of them in a new TV series.

Seriously, guys. I wouldn't recommend ever installing anything on your computers. You never know what might find its way into your My Documents folder.