1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

"Jefferson" Project Forum News

Discussion in 'Game/SP News & Comments' started by NewsPro, Dec 22, 2002.

  1. NewsPro Gems: 30/31
    Latest gem: King's Tears


    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    3,599
    Likes Received:
    0
    (Originally posted by Veldrin)

    Here are today's Jefferson project forum highlights. Please take into account that these are only single parts of various threads and should not be taken out of context.

    J.E. Sawyer, Lead Designer

    More On Inventory: Do you feel ripped off when your high strength, low intelligence characters don't get many skill points? Strength-based encumbrance systems don't FORCE anyone to do anything, unless you count "making difficult choices". High strength characters get to carry a lot and hit creatures really hard. High dexterity characters get to tumble around like ninjas and throw daggers into stirges at thirty paces. People who have low strength or low dex can't do those things as well. That's why the player has to make choices about what kind of character(s) they want to make.

    We could also make a 3D backpack to allow players to place their objects in approximations of real space, too. I don't know why the hell we'd waste our time doing that, though, since a weight-based system already forces players to make difficult choices about their party composition.

    I can GUARANTEE that not a single DM posting in this thread ever checks their players' character sheets to make sure that the volume of their gear is realistic. It is so often the case in RPGs that the largest things are the heaviest that putting a volume system in comes close to being redundant. Armor? Big and heavy. Greatswords? Big and heavy. Rocket launchers? Big and heavy. People don't carry many giant stuffed teddy bears out of dungeons. Even in a system like Diablo, you wouldn't be too hard pressed to carry numerous suits of armor around if you had four or five party members. For practical purposes, characters are going to hit their weight limits before a similar volume restriction -- so why does it even matter?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2018
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.