1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Perceiving the Universe

Discussion in 'Alley of Dangerous Angles' started by Elios, Feb 23, 2003.

  1. Capstone Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    May 8, 2001
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] That is the problem some astrophysicists have with the expansionist model. However, the assumption that the universe cannot expand infinitely is precisely that: an assumption, with no logical or reasonal foundation -- only a gut instinct. And there is far too much that defies instinct on the cosmological level and the microscopic level to reject a model simply on that basis.
     
  2. BGP Gems: 3/31
    Latest gem: Lynx Eye


    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] The problem is one of perspective.

    Some parts of our reality, such as at a subatomic level, resist direct viewing because the moment we attempt to look at an area, the things we do in order to make certain particles visible distorts their common behavior. We turn the lights on, but the cockroaches scatter.

    I wonder if the same thing happens on a macro level--if all the cheers and hurrahs surrounding the distances and objects we can see via Hubble are less helpful than we think. And if red shift is as helpful as we think, given the possibility that back in time, physical properties/laws of physics may have been been subtly different.

    This difference could be minute, but because of the vast distance, it would be magnified. If gravitons are packed more densely in the early universe, for instance, that would tell us the local gravitational constant (the way two objects with mass interact) would be different.

    All that being said, I think we can deduct the nature of very large and very small objects better by understanding commonly sized objects' behavior better and use those clearer observations to inform the unclear. It's sexy and fun to talk about seeing further than ever and speculating about what we are seeing, but those announcments are all about money and research dollars for next year--not about science. Real science rarely fits in a 50 word blurb on a press release with a glossy picture to illustrate.

    A good example of how science tries, to its own peril, to market itself is the debate about "what color are galaxies?" We colorize pictures of nebulai, and now that we've done it with those lovely blues and reds, scientists have to photoshop everything to match it or people think it's not real or not high quality photos, and therefore not good science. Articles that discusses this question are:

    http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~kgb/cosspec/

    which talks about the "color" of space, making it clear that it's all subjective

    and

    http://www.discover-net.net/~xecon/astroimg.htm

    which explains the way they apply color to astronomical data.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.