1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

The Ubiquitous Party/Character Thread

Discussion in 'Icewind Dale 2' started by Acrux, Sep 29, 2005.

  1. Acrux Gems: 8/31
    Latest gem: Skydrop


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay, here we go with another one...

    Just a few characters I've been thinking about creating, but I was wondering if anyone has an opinion about any of these builds (and I'm sure someone will). Also note that these may/may not be in the same party.

    (No stats yet - just in draft mode):
    A Deep Gnome Druid(~21)/Illusionist (~9)

    Note that I have Improved Shapeshifting installed, and I'm thinking that the high ECL will be a nice balance with the overpoweredness of the shapeshifts.

    An Aasimar Paladin(2)/Monk(10)/Painbearer(18)

    The ultimate in lawful-goodness.

    Bard(11)/Wizard(x)

    What I would like opinion on here is whether Human or Elf would be better. I don't want to use a Bard/Sorcerer and thought I'd try something a little different.

    These two are similar, and I'm wondering about the Ranger levels:

    Half-Orc Fighter(4)/Ranger(3)/Barbarian(x)
    Tiefling Fighter(4)/Ranger(3)/Rogue(x)


    The Half-Orc will be dual-wielding (axes, natch) so Ranger probably works there, but I might rather use 2 Feats and still be able to wear heavy armor.

    The Tiefling will mostly be used for ranged support, so I could probably get rid of the Ranger levels, unless anyone knows of a good reason to keep them.

    The ones I'm most interested in getting feedback on are the Deep Gnome and the Aasimar -- has anyone used these builds before? Do they work well or do they sound cooler than they are practical. Thanks for any input/feedback.
     
  2. Shrikant

    Shrikant Swords! Not words! Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2003
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Are you going to take the party thru HoF mode? In normal your charecters will get to ~20 levels only.

    Deep Gnome Druid(~21)/Illusionist (~9)
    Frankly, that Improved Shapshifting mod is way overpowered. It makes Druids more unbalanced than Sorcerers.
    Also, why the 9 Illusionist levels? They would hardly add any value to the charecter. If you had fighter/barb/ranger levels at the begining of the game for this guy, it would be more useful. Then again the XP penalties ...
    Better to make him a pure Druid, specially if shapeshifting is going to be his main fighting style.

    Aasimar Paladin(2)/Monk(10)/Painbearer(18)
    Why the 10 monk levels? It would be better to increase the Paladin levels and/or add a few Fighter levels to make him a better melee fighter. Keeping the Monk levels low will be advantageous.
    A Drow can Paladin[3]/Fighter[4]/Monk[3] and not take any XP penalty.

    Bard(11)/Wizard(x)
    Any specific reason for making this one a mage. Why not Bard/Cleric. Oghma is the Bard's nearest available parton god afterall. I would prefer to make this guy a Drow (+2 Char) or Human (+1 skill/level) and not a pure elf.

    Half-Orc Fighter(4)/Ranger(3)/Barbarian(x)
    Tiefling Fighter(4)/Ranger(3)/Rogue(x)

    The best weapons for a strong melee fighter are two handed weapons. Dual-weilding axes might turnout not to be a good idea.
    Ranger[3]gets nothing. Atleast Ranger[5] gets to choose an additional favoured enemy.
     
  3. Acrux Gems: 8/31
    Latest gem: Skydrop


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Eh...I was just wondering if anyone else had tried any of these. Mostly, I wanted know how viable they are. I agree that Improved Shapeshifting is extremely overpowered. Druids are a class I love "in theory," but usually find them to be too weak without improvements and too strong with them. I thought adding the +3 ECL might help balance some of the overpoweredness. The illusionist levels are more of an afterthought, really. The idea of an invisible shapeshifted druid just sounds appealing.

    You're right on fewer monk levels -- and the Drow build sounds interesting too. I might consider that one.

    I'm not sure what to do with this Bard. A Bard/something would be good, and I'd like to try something innovative. Maybe a CN Bard/Barbarian/Cleric who worships the forces of chaos...I'll keep thinking about this one.

    Again, you're right on the two extra levels of Ranger. I don't know what I was thinking.
     
  4. chevalier

    chevalier Knight of Everfull Chalice ★ SPS Account Holder Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2002
    Messages:
    16,815
    Media:
    11
    Likes Received:
    58
    Gender:
    Male
    Why just three classes? Fighter/ranger/barbarian/rogue actually worked for my brother. ;)
     
  5. Shrikant

    Shrikant Swords! Not words! Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2003
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    [​IMG] You want multiple classes, I'll give you multiple classes. Just search for the confused deep gnome:

    Rogue[2]/Monk[1]/Dreadmaster[1]/Fighter[2]/Paladin[2]/Ranger[1]/Illusionist[21]
    Stats: 8-20-10-15-20-1

    This guy is the most useful sheild charecter ever. He has insane AC (even before buffs), max spell resistance, immunity to fear and can use practically every scroll and wand you can get your hands on. :D
     
  6. Goon66 Gems: 6/31
    Latest gem: Jasper


    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    That character has too many classes and clashing alignments its impossible isnt it? Or is it something you just thought of and didnt play?
     
  7. kuemper Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Messages:
    8,926
    Likes Received:
    8
    The only alignment restrictive classes are the monk and pally, both which can be LG. You'd think this was made up and never used, but it has.
     
  8. Elvenblade Gems: 14/31
    Latest gem: Chrysoberyl


    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dreadmasters needs to be evil or one of the neutral alignments (can't remember which).
     
  9. Shrikant

    Shrikant Swords! Not words! Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2003
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Got confused with the two variants. My bad.

    Deep Gnome LE
    Rogue[2]/Monk[1]/Dreadmaster of Bane[1]/Fighter[2]/Ranger[1]/Illusionist[21] ~
    Stats: 8-20-10-15-20-1

    Notice that this guy has two levels remaining. Since mages receive no new spells between L21 to L24, taking more Illusionist levels is of no use. Level squatting at the end and taking 2 fighter levels to specialise in weapon(s) of your choice is recommended.

    Deep Gnome LG
    Rogue[2]/Monk[1]/Painbearer of Ilmater[1]/Fighter[2]/Paladin of Ilmater[2]/Ranger[1]/Illusionist[21] ~
    Stats: 8-20-10-15-20-1

    The Cleric may worship Helm, Ilmater or Lathander. The cleric level is there so that he can use the cleric spell scrolls. For RP reasons I prefer to make him Paladin & Cleric of Ilmater.

    Level progression is as follows:
    L1 - Rogue
    L2 - Ranger (favoured enemy: Goblin)
    L3 - Cleric
    L4 - Illusionist (start scribing all mage scrolls ;) )
    L5 - Rogue (for evasion)
    Concentrate on Illusionist from now on.
    Take Fighter levels if you feel he is hitting nothing. Or if you want the free feats. Otherwise leave as late as possible.
    If LG, take the Paladin levels before you get to Chult. Yuan-ti are the first to actively use fear on you iirc. Paladin of Ilmater should be able to cleanse the statue in the Kuldahar graveyard.
    Take the Monk level only after Kuldahar. Since the level up stat points will go to Int, armoured+sheild AC is better than Wis based AC till now. Or take it if you need to improve his saves.

    4 of the first 5 level up stat points go to Int (for 19Int lets you cast 9th level spells). 1 goes to Dex so you can use the 'Potion of Holy Transferance'. The last 2 go to either Dex or Wis to improve your AC.
     
  10. MrNexx Gems: 7/31
    Latest gem: Tchazar


    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    0
    For RP reasons I prefer to make him Paladin & Cleric of Ilmater.

    Anyone doing this character is doing nothing for RP reasons... he's doing things for XP reasons. ;)
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.